Thursday, June 14, 2012

(06xx2012) Testing V

Purpose:

After we have secure a majority of water leakage by applying the inner tube configuration we tested a new pressure sensor. Unfortunately we experienced a structural failure on the lid after achieving 60kPa of pressure. We have recorded the pressure in the following video and graph.


Video:


Figure 1: Pressure vs Time 



Figure 2: Pressure vs Time on different interval




Analysis and Uncertainty


Table 1: Recorded Pressure and Height
Pressure (kPa)
Height (m)
61.5 ± 5
6 ± 0.3




Figure 3: Pressure vs Time with Linear Fitting



We have recorded a maximum pressure of 61.5 kPa and a corresponding height of 6 meter, by the equation:
 P = P0 + ρgh
We should get:
P/h = ρg

Therefore we can compare experimental ρg with theoretical value

Table 2: Comparison of Experimental and Theoretical Data
Experimental ρg (N/m3)
Theoretical ρg (N/m3)
Error (%)
10250 ± 488
9810
4.49%


Uncertainty = Largest value of ρg - smallest value of ρg

Our experimental uncertainty is within the range with the theoretical value. Our experimental value is also within 5% of the theoretical value.

We attribute our errors to the pressure sensor. The pressure sensor that we utilized in this project is design for gas pressure and not for fluid and therefore we believe that the majority of our error can be attributed to the sensor.


A theoretical model is provide below:



from pylab import *
import re

x = arange(0,1,.01)
y = 101325*x/(9810)

plot(x,y)

xlabel('Pressure (atm)')
ylabel('Depth (m)')


title(r'$Pressure(h)$')


show()




Figure 4: Theoretical Height vs. Pressure





No comments:

Post a Comment